Customized frozen embryo transfer after identification of the receptivity window with a transcriptomic approach improves the implantation and live birth rates in patients with repeated implantation failure

Delphine Haouzi (1, 2, 3) , Frida Entezami (4, 5, 3) , Antoine Torre (6) , Charlène Innocenti (1, 2, 3) , Yannick Antoine (1, 2, 3) , Charlotte Mauries (2) , Claire Vincens (2) , Sophie Bringer-Deutsch (2) , Anna Gala (2, 3) , Alice Ferrieres-Hoa (2, 3) , Jeanine Ohl (7) , Beatriz Gonzalez Marti (4, 5) , Sophie Brouillet (2, 1, 8, 3) , Samir Hamamah (2, 1, 3)

1 Cellules Souches, Plasticité Cellulaire, Médecine Régénératrice et Immunothérapies (IRMB)
2 Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve [CHRU Montpellier]
3 DEFE - Développement Embryonnaire, Fertilité et Environnement
4 Hôpital Américain de Paris
5 Clinique de la Muette
6 UON - University of Nottingham, UK
7 CMCO - Centre Médico-chirurgical Obstétrique
8 BCI - Biologie du Cancer et de l'Infection

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate outcome benefits expected in repeated implantation failure (RIF) patients ( n = 217) after customized embryo transfer based upon identification of the receptivity window by transcriptomic approach using the Win-Test. In this test, the expression of 11 endometrial genes known to be predictive of endometrial receptivity is assessed by RT-PCR in biopsies collected during the implantation window (6–9 days after the spontaneous luteinizing hormone surge during natural cycles, 5–9 days after progesterone administration during hormone replacement therapy cycles). Then, patients underwent either customized embryo transfer (cET, n = 157 patients) according to the Win-Test results or embryo transfer according to the classical procedure (control group, n = 60). Pregnancy and live birth rates were compared in the two groups. The Win-Test showed that in 78.5% of women, the receptivity window lasted less than 48 h, although it could be shorter (< 24 h, 9.5%) or longer (> 48 h, 12%). This highlighted that only in 20% of patients with RIF the endometrium would have been receptive if the classical embryo transfer protocol was followed. In the other 80% of patients, the receptivity window was delayed by 1–3 days relative to the classical timing. This suggests that implantation failure could be linked to inadequate timing of embryo transfer. In agreement, both implantation (22.7% vs. 7.2%) and live birth rates per patient (31.8% vs. 8.3%) were significantly higher in the cET group than in the control group. cET on the basis of the Win-Test results could be proposed to improve pregnancy and live birth rates. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04192396; December 5, 2019, retrospectively registered.

Mots clés: Implantation window; Receptivity window; Transcriptome; Win-Test

Domaines: Gynécologie et obstétrique; Génomique, Transcriptomique et Protéomique [q-bio.GN]

Delphine Haouzi, Frida Entezami, Antoine Torre, Charlène Innocenti, Yannick Antoine, et al.. Customized frozen embryo transfer after identification of the receptivity window with a transcriptomic approach improves the implantation and live birth rates in patients with repeated implantation failure. Reproductive Sciences, 2021, 28 (1), pp.69-78. ⟨10.1007/s43032-020-00252-0⟩. ⟨hal-03615670⟩